Skip to content
PAYMENTS
CAREERS
858-737-3100
Open mobile menu
Close mobile menu
FIRM
OVERVIEW
APPROACH
CORE VALUES
AFFILIATIONS
ADMISSIONS
RECOGNITION
CONTACT
ONE TEAM
ATTORNEYS
STAFF
CONSTRUCTION LAW
CLAIMS & DISPUTES
WORKPLACE SAFETY & HEALTH
LOCAL AGENCY, MUNICIPAL & STATE CONTRACTS
LABOR & EMPLOYMENT
FEDERAL PROCUREMENT & CLAIMS
REAL ESTATE
PRIME CONTRACTS & SUBCONTRACTS
CORPORATE
COLLECTIONS
INSURANCE DEFENSE
PROJECT COUNSEL
WEALTH PRESERVATION
OTHER PRACTICES
WORKPLACE SAFETY & HEALTH
LABOR & EMPLOYMENT
BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL LITIGATION
BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS
REAL ESTATE
LIABILITY DEFENSE
WEALTH PRESERVATION
KNOWLEDGE
LEGAL UPDATES
SEMINARS
FTB NEWS
RESULTS
BY PROJECT TYPE
CONSTRUCTION LAW
OTHER EXPERIENCE
PUBLISHED DECISIONS
E-BROCHURES
Engineering Contractor v. City
September 9, 2024
The firm represented an engineering contractor in a lawsuit to recover delay and disruption costs for building a replacement bridge. The municipality counter sued for $25 million claiming the bridge was defective and had to be replaced. The lawsuit scope grew to include several design professionals implicated by differing site conditions, design issues, and permits related to in and out of water work. After substantial written and oral discovery, followed by mediation, and shortly before a jury trial, the case settled for payment to the firm’s client of 95 percent of its demand. The firm also successfully transferred defense costs related to the counterclaim to insurers of the project risks, substantially reducing its client’s litigation spend.
Counsel:
P. Randolph Finch Jr.
and
Louis J. Blum
previous post:
General Contractor v. Trade Subcontractors
next post:
CIDH Pile Contractor v. Bridge Builder
858-737-3100
CONTACT
FIRM
ONE TEAM
ATTORNEYS
STAFF
CONSTRUCTION LAW
OTHER PRACTICES
KNOWLEDGE
RESULTS
CAREERS
E-BROCHURES
PAY YOUR INVOICE OR RETAINER ONLINE
DISCLAIMER
Back To Top
Search